Pure Logic of Necessitation + L
Pure Logic of Necessitation
> In the context of provability logic, one may wonder the completeness of N+GL\mathsf{N + GL}GL(φφ)φ\sf GL \equiv \Box(\Box\varphi \to \varphi) \to \Box\varphi, which is not of the form Accm,n\mathrm{Acc}_{m,n} and thus not covered by this paper. Many of the N\sf N counterpart of the famous extensions of K\sf K are still left uninvestigated.

Def
NL\sf NL
Axiom
Taut\sf Taut:
L\sf L: L: (φφ)φ\Box(\Box\varphi \to \varphi) \to \Box\varphi
Rule
: NLφ\sf NL \vdash \varphiNLφψ\sf NL \vdash \varphi \to \psiNLψ\sf NL \vdash \psi
: NLφ\sf NL \vdash \varphiNLφ\sf NL \vdash \Box\varphi
TφT \vdash \varphi    \impliesTPrT(φ)T \vdash \mathrm{Pr}_T (\overline{\ulcorner \varphi \urcorner})
D1TTPA\sf PARE